How To Evaluate a Film's Political Commentary

Film, as an art form, has always been a potent tool for reflecting societal issues, expressing political ideas, and sometimes even influencing public opinion. From the early days of cinema to the modern digital era, filmmakers have used the medium to comment on politics, power structures, social injustices, and ideologies. However, evaluating the political commentary of a film is far from a straightforward task. It involves understanding the context in which the film was made, analyzing the narrative, characters, symbolism, and tone, and considering the broader socio-political environment in which the film engages.

In this article, we will explore various ways to evaluate a film's political commentary, examining key elements such as narrative structure, character development, the director's intent, the use of symbolism, and the socio-historical context. This analysis will not only help in understanding how a film communicates its political ideas but also provide insight into how films can shape and reflect political discourse.

Contextualizing the Film

Before evaluating the political commentary of a film, it is crucial to understand the context in which it was made. Political commentary in film is often shaped by the historical, cultural, and political environment in which the filmmaker operates. This includes both the era during which the film was produced and the specific socio-political climate it addresses. For example, films made during periods of social upheaval, such as the Civil Rights Movement in the United States or post-colonial struggles, often reflect the political concerns of their time.

Historical Context

The time period in which a film is produced plays a significant role in its political commentary. A film made during the Cold War, for instance, may have different political implications than one made during the post-9/11 era. Understanding the political climate of the time can provide crucial insights into why certain issues are emphasized or critiqued in the film.

• Cold War Films : Films like Dr. Strangelove (1964) and The Manchurian Candidate (1962) reflect the paranoia and ideological tension of the Cold War, often critiquing the dangers of nuclear weapons, political ideologies, and the concept of global domination.
• Post-9/11 Films : Films made after the September 11 attacks, such as Fahrenheit 9/11 (2004) and The Hurt Locker (2008), provide commentary on the War on Terror, the U.S. military's actions in the Middle East, and the broader implications of foreign policy.

Cultural Context

Film can also comment on the cultural landscape of a particular period. Films often reflect dominant cultural values, norms, and debates surrounding issues like race, gender, and identity. Understanding the cultural climate of the time can help clarify the messages conveyed by a film's political commentary.

• Civil Rights Era : Movies like Selma (2014) and Malcolm X (1992) directly engage with the Civil Rights Movement, exploring issues of race, equality, and social justice in America.
• Feminist Films : In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, films such as Thelma & Louise (1991) and Thelma & Louise (1991) reflect feminist struggles, exploring issues of gender inequality, societal expectations, and women's agency.

Political Context

The political context in which a film is made can have a significant influence on its content and tone. Filmmakers may be responding to current political events, societal tensions, or government policies. For example, a director who is critical of a particular political system may use their film to express dissent, while a film produced under an authoritarian regime may adopt a more subtle or allegorical approach to convey political critique.

• Political Dissent : Films such as The Battle of Algiers (1966) and Z (1969) depict political resistance, focusing on the dynamics of revolutionary movements and the oppressive tactics used by governments to suppress dissent.
• State-Controlled Cinema: In contrast, films made under state censorship may engage in more indirect forms of political commentary, using allegories, metaphors, or symbolic narratives to critique political power.

Analyzing the Narrative Structure

A key component of evaluating a film's political commentary is analyzing its narrative structure. The way in which a film tells its story---its plot development, pacing, and thematic focus---can reveal much about its political message.

Storytelling and Political Themes

Many films present their political commentary through the central themes and conflicts in the narrative. These themes may directly address issues like class struggle, corruption, freedom, and social justice, or they may offer more nuanced critiques of specific political ideologies or systems. A careful analysis of the film's plot and character arcs can help uncover the underlying political commentary.

• Class Struggle : Films like Parasite (2019) explore the disparities between the wealthy and the poor, offering a critique of class inequality and the structures that perpetuate economic and social injustice.
• Revolution and Resistance : Movies such as V for Vendetta (2005) and The Hunger Games (2012) depict characters who resist oppressive regimes, exploring themes of individual agency, rebellion, and the power of collective action.

The Hero's Journey as Political Commentary

The traditional hero's journey, a narrative structure commonly used in storytelling, can also serve as a lens for political commentary. The hero's quest often mirrors larger political struggles, such as the fight against tyranny, the battle for freedom, or the fight for equality. Analyzing how the protagonist navigates their journey and the challenges they face can offer insights into the film's political message.

• Heroic Resistance : In films like Star Wars (1977) or The Matrix (1999), the protagonist's fight against oppressive forces can be seen as a metaphor for political resistance and the quest for liberation.
• Moral Ambiguity : Films like Apocalypse Now (1979) and No Country for Old Men (2007) explore the moral complexity of political struggles, questioning the legitimacy of power and the consequences of violence.

Character Development and Political Ideology

The development of characters, especially the protagonist and antagonist, plays a central role in conveying a film's political commentary. The way characters are portrayed, their relationships, and their individual journeys can highlight ideological struggles and reflect political viewpoints.

Protagonists and Political Ideals

In many films, the protagonist represents a particular political ideology or set of values. By examining the protagonist's actions, motivations, and relationships, viewers can gain insight into the film's political stance.

• Revolutionary Ideals : In Les Misérables (2012), the protagonist, Jean Valjean, symbolizes the fight for justice and equality in a politically oppressive society. His actions and moral choices highlight themes of social reform and the struggles of the working class.
• Individual vs. State : Films like 1984 (1984) and The Truman Show (1998) explore the tension between individual freedom and state control, with protagonists who resist totalitarian systems.

Antagonists and Oppressive Systems

The antagonist in a film often represents the forces of oppression or injustice, and analyzing their motivations can reveal the film's critique of political power structures. In many cases, the antagonist embodies a corrupt or authoritarian system, highlighting issues such as fascism, inequality, or corporate greed.

• Authoritarianism : In The Trial (1962) and The Lives of Others (2006), the antagonist represents the power of authoritarian regimes, exposing the ways in which oppressive systems control and manipulate individuals.
• Corporate Greed : In The Social Network (2010), the antagonist, Mark Zuckerberg, represents the pursuit of profit at the expense of ethical considerations, critiquing the tech industry's influence on society.

Symbolism and Allegory

Film often uses symbolism and allegory to convey political messages, providing a layer of depth that can enrich the viewer's understanding of the film's commentary. Symbols can take many forms, from visual imagery to character archetypes, and can serve as metaphors for political concepts or ideologies.

Visual Symbolism

A film's use of visual imagery, such as color, lighting, or specific objects, can carry political significance. For example, the use of red in a film might symbolize revolution, violence, or communism, while dark shadows might represent oppression or fear.

• Color and Power : In Schindler's List (1993), the film uses the color red sparingly to symbolize the innocence of the Jewish victims during the Holocaust and the violence they suffer under Nazi rule.
• The Power of the State : In Brazil (1985), director Terry Gilliam uses surreal and oppressive visual imagery to convey the dehumanizing effect of a bureaucratic, totalitarian state.

Allegory and Political Ideology

Allegory is another powerful tool filmmakers use to express political commentary. Through allegorical storytelling, filmmakers can explore political themes in a more indirect, symbolic manner, allowing the audience to draw connections between the narrative and real-world political situations.

• Animal Farm : George Orwell's Animal Farm (1954) is a classic example of political allegory, using animals on a farm to represent different political figures and ideologies, particularly the Russian Revolution and the rise of Soviet totalitarianism.
• The Matrix : In The Matrix (1999), the concept of "The Matrix" itself serves as an allegory for societal control and the manipulation of reality, reflecting the tension between freedom and oppression.

The Director's Intent and Filmmaker's Ideology

Finally, evaluating the political commentary of a film involves understanding the filmmaker's intent and the personal ideologies they bring to their work. Directors, writers, and producers often infuse their personal political beliefs into their films, which can influence the political message of the final product.

Understanding the Filmmaker's Ideology

Many filmmakers have well-known political beliefs, and these beliefs often manifest in their films. For example, directors like Oliver Stone (Platoon , JFK ) and Michael Moore (Bowling for Columbine , Fahrenheit 9/11) are known for their political activism and have used film as a platform to express their views on war, government corruption, and social justice.

• Stone's Critique of War : Oliver Stone's Platoon (1986) provides a brutal portrayal of the Vietnam War, reflecting Stone's own anti-war stance and the political climate of the 1980s.
• Moore's Critique of Gun Violence : Michael Moore's Bowling for Columbine (2002) critiques America's gun culture, highlighting the political implications of gun violence and the influence of the media and political systems.

Director's Influence on Political Tone

The political tone of a film is often shaped by the director's personal views and the political environment in which they work. Some directors may adopt a more overtly political stance, while others may focus on subtler, more nuanced critiques.

• Political Activism : Directors like Ken Loach (The Wind That Shakes the Barley , Sorry We Missed You) use their films to explicitly critique capitalist systems and social inequality, often portraying working-class struggles and the consequences of systemic oppression.
• Nuanced Political Commentary : In contrast, directors like Wes Anderson (The Grand Budapest Hotel , Moonrise Kingdom) may incorporate political themes in a more abstract, artistic manner, using satire or absurdity to explore issues of power and class.

Conclusion

Evaluating a film's political commentary is a multifaceted process that requires an understanding of its historical, cultural, and political context, as well as a detailed analysis of its narrative structure, character development, symbolism, and the director's intent. A film's political commentary can take many forms, from direct critiques of political systems to more subtle, symbolic representations of power, resistance, and social justice. By carefully considering these elements, viewers can gain a deeper understanding of how films engage with politics and the ways in which they reflect, challenge, or shape public discourse.

Ultimately, films have the potential to both entertain and educate, offering powerful insights into the political realities of the world. By evaluating their political commentary, we can better understand the impact of cinema on political thought and its ability to influence change.

View Product